Top Guidelines Of h4831sc load data
Top Guidelines Of h4831sc load data
Blog Article
Considering the fact that there does not appear to be any "official" Load Data around for this Load, can a few of you deliver a place to begin with this mix and matters to consider when Performing this Load up?
H4831SC Powder accessible in stock now. Ballistically, this Extreme Extruded powder is the exact copy of H4831. Bodily, it's a shorter grain measurement, for that reason, the designation SC or limited Reduce. The shorter, much more compact kernels allow the powder to move in the powder actions far more easily, helping to alleviate the regular slicing of granules.
What is the real difference? Compression. Without the Excessive/significant compression affiliated with the long grain 7828, the pressure curve was altered and also the load fell apart.
Minnesota H4831SC is my check out from the 7mm Rem Mag, but I am conserving the minimal I've left for drop 2021. I would start out small and function your way up, dependant upon what load data you evaluate for this combo the min/max loads are all over the board.
INgunner54 claimed: It has been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Observed a node and shot some groups.
WARNING: This item can expose you to guide, which is thought to your Point out of California to cause cancer and beginning defects or other reproductive damage. To learn more drop by – .
i've utilised the two and applied the exact same rates and also have not been in the position to inform any noticable variations with general performance. the SC Edition meters a little bit smoother is about all. any remarks??
Anyhow, I wished to give some 7828SC a try to lower some of the compression. What a h4831sc error, I could not get this powder to shoot properly or produce the velocities I get with regular 7828.
I've located the precise opposite to get true in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and equally exact powder in my three hundred Get Mag.
Furthermore, it goes on to declare that because of the fshorter grains, that load density may be marginally larger.
Despite the similarity in nomenclature, they're completely diverse powders, with IMR 4831 getting substantially speedier compared to the Hodgdon variants. Really don't take care of them as the exact same powder, as they most h4831sc undoubtedly are certainly not.
It can be most likely that no further more discussion is required, in which case we suggest commencing a fresh thread. If having said that you are feeling your response is needed you'll be able h4831sc load data to nonetheless achieve this.
Both contain the Exact same melt away charge, shorter Slash is available in handy if you are at max fill instead of at force/velocity you want you can obtain more shortcut in the scenario.
I discovered that my 7mag 160 partitions have been sub MOA with 4831sc with low to min charges. I’m speaking 2700 (perhaps 2800) fps, it had been a minimal 60s grain cost inside a Norma circumstance. Not what I used to be trying to find, but precise Nevertheless.